Nonetheless, Mother’s counsel filed an affidavit which addressed the reasonableness of her legal fees. The trial Court determined that Mother did not offer adequate evidence for the Court to award attorney fees. Specifically, the trial Court noted that to any extent to which the post-hearing affidavit of Mother’s counsel addressed reasonableness, it was not properly before the Court. The trial Court further noted that prior North Carolina caselaw precludes the Court from taking judicial notice of the typical fees charged by counsel.
The North Carolina Court of Appeals disagreed with the trial Court’s reliance on prior legal authority precluding it from taking judicial notice of customary hourly rates of local attorneys performing the same services and having the same experience. It noted that the better practice is for movants to submit evidence of the customary local rates of attorneys. Ultimately, the NC Court of Appeals remanded the case to the trial Court for it to determine whether it wished to take judicial notice of the typical fees charged in its jurisdiction for similar work.
Thank you for visiting Charlotte Divorce Lawyer Blog. If you are looking for a Charlotte attorney fee lawyer, please give us a call.